This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
a:fommxintro [2021/01/19 22:40] sz |
a:fommxintro [2022/03/17 02:00] (current) sz |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | == Overview of FOMMX == | + | == Overview of FOMM Experiment |
| - | {{tag> top}} | ||
| ====== Overview of the Fiber-Optic Michelson-Morley Experiment ====== | ====== Overview of the Fiber-Optic Michelson-Morley Experiment ====== | ||
| Line 7: | Line 6: | ||
| According to the Æther Theory of the 1800' | According to the Æther Theory of the 1800' | ||
| - | Following this experimental rejection of the Ether Theory, relativity theories were developed that explain the 1887 Michelson-Morley results. Beginning at the same time, Michelson-Morley experiments were performed with various configurations, | + | Following this experimental rejection of the Ether Theory, relativity theories were developed that explain the 1887 Michelson-Morley results. Beginning at the same time, Michelson-Morley experiments were performed with various configurations, |
| Based upon a review of 100 years of such experimentation, | Based upon a review of 100 years of such experimentation, | ||
| * The Mass Density in the Light Path: Vacuum results are consistent with relativity; dense materials are generally not. (Shamir & Fox, D. Miller) | * The Mass Density in the Light Path: Vacuum results are consistent with relativity; dense materials are generally not. (Shamir & Fox, D. Miller) | ||
| - | * The Extent | + | * The Size of the Light Path: Short light path results are consistent with special relativity; long light paths are generally not consistent with relativity. (D. Miller) |
| - | The extent | + | The size of the light path is defined here as the longest |
| I have tested these conjectures by performing an experiment that is a variant of the Michelson-Morley experiment. | I have tested these conjectures by performing an experiment that is a variant of the Michelson-Morley experiment. | ||
| - | The objective of this experiment is to test the combination of mass density and light path extent | + | The objective of this experiment is to test the combination of mass density and light path size most likely to contradict special relativity in the Michelson-Morley experiment. |
| This combination of parameters has been achieved by using optical fiber rather than the mirrors used in earlier Michelson-Morley experiments. | This combination of parameters has been achieved by using optical fiber rather than the mirrors used in earlier Michelson-Morley experiments. | ||
| - | The core of an optical fiber, where the light travels, is typically | + | The core of an optical fiber, where the light travels, is glass. The mass density of glass is far larger than that of a lab vacuum or ambient air, which were used in earlier Michelson-Morley experiments. |
| Optical fiber enables long light paths to be formed that are more immune to thermal and mechanical variations than mirror systems. | Optical fiber enables long light paths to be formed that are more immune to thermal and mechanical variations than mirror systems. | ||
| In addition, fiber optic systems do not require the demanding alignment process that is required by mirror systems. Finally, the fiber optic approach is far less expensive than the mirror approach. | In addition, fiber optic systems do not require the demanding alignment process that is required by mirror systems. Finally, the fiber optic approach is far less expensive than the mirror approach. | ||
| - | An extensive standard description of the Michelson-Morley experiment is given in the [[wp>// | + | An extensive standard description of the Michelson-Morley experiment is given in the [[wp> |
| This experiment does employ a fiber optic light path, as described. The straight arm length is 5 meters. | This experiment does employ a fiber optic light path, as described. The straight arm length is 5 meters. | ||
| - | I have run my experiment over a period of half a year, and it is still running. The results are certainly not null. They have many clear features | + | I have run my experiment |
| The important question is to determine whether these patterns were likely conventional effects or not. | The important question is to determine whether these patterns were likely conventional effects or not. | ||
| If they are not conventional effects, then the test does not support relativity. | If they are not conventional effects, then the test does not support relativity. | ||
| - | That would reopen the door to wave theories similar to the aether | + | That would reopen the door to wave theories similar to the æther |
| - | The bulk of this site describes | + | The bulk of this website will describe |
| - | The preliminary analysis and conclusions | + | The preliminary analysis and conclusions |
| - | Next, the logic of Falsification is discussed. | + | Next, the relationship |
| - | And finally, the implications of the fall of relativity and, in turn, of statistical particle physics and the return of wave physics | + | And finally, the implications of the required extensions to relativity and to statistical particle physics and the return of deterministic |
| + | |||
| + | < | ||
| + | use straight arm length, not size | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{tag> | ||
| - | ...sz | ||