This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
a:fommxintro [2021/12/09 04:34] sz |
a:fommxintro [2022/03/17 02:00] (current) sz |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | == Overview of FOMMX == | + | == Overview of FOMM Experiment |
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| According to the Æther Theory of the 1800' | According to the Æther Theory of the 1800' | ||
| - | Following this experimental rejection of the Ether Theory, relativity theories were developed that explain the 1887 Michelson-Morley results. Beginning at the same time, Michelson-Morley experiments were performed with various configurations, | + | Following this experimental rejection of the Ether Theory, relativity theories were developed that explain the 1887 Michelson-Morley results. Beginning at the same time, Michelson-Morley experiments were performed with various configurations, |
| Based upon a review of 100 years of such experimentation, | Based upon a review of 100 years of such experimentation, | ||
| * The Mass Density in the Light Path: Vacuum results are consistent with relativity; dense materials are generally not. (Shamir & Fox, D. Miller) | * The Mass Density in the Light Path: Vacuum results are consistent with relativity; dense materials are generally not. (Shamir & Fox, D. Miller) | ||
| - | * The Extent | + | * The Size of the Light Path: Short light path results are consistent with special relativity; long light paths are generally not consistent with relativity. (D. Miller) |
| - | The extent | + | The size of the light path is defined here as the longest straight line distance from one point in the light path to another. Conventional Michelson-Morley experiments used mirrors to direct the light path to retrace itself and multiply the small interferometric effect by the number of traces. That principle is useful and still applies here, although it is incomplete. The mass density and geometric |
| I have tested these conjectures by performing an experiment that is a variant of the Michelson-Morley experiment. | I have tested these conjectures by performing an experiment that is a variant of the Michelson-Morley experiment. | ||
| - | The objective of this experiment is to test the combination of mass density and light path extent | + | The objective of this experiment is to test the combination of mass density and light path size most likely to contradict special relativity in the Michelson-Morley experiment. |
| This combination of parameters has been achieved by using optical fiber rather than the mirrors used in earlier Michelson-Morley experiments. | This combination of parameters has been achieved by using optical fiber rather than the mirrors used in earlier Michelson-Morley experiments. | ||
| - | The core of an optical fiber, where the light travels, is typically | + | The core of an optical fiber, where the light travels, is glass. The mass density of glass is far larger than that of a lab vacuum or ambient air, which were used in earlier Michelson-Morley experiments. |
| Optical fiber enables long light paths to be formed that are more immune to thermal and mechanical variations than mirror systems. | Optical fiber enables long light paths to be formed that are more immune to thermal and mechanical variations than mirror systems. | ||
| In addition, fiber optic systems do not require the demanding alignment process that is required by mirror systems. Finally, the fiber optic approach is far less expensive than the mirror approach. | In addition, fiber optic systems do not require the demanding alignment process that is required by mirror systems. Finally, the fiber optic approach is far less expensive than the mirror approach. | ||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
| This experiment does employ a fiber optic light path, as described. The straight arm length is 5 meters. | This experiment does employ a fiber optic light path, as described. The straight arm length is 5 meters. | ||
| - | I have run my experiment over a period of half a year, and it is still running. The results are certainly not null. They have many clear features | + | I have run my experiment |
| The important question is to determine whether these patterns were likely conventional effects or not. | The important question is to determine whether these patterns were likely conventional effects or not. | ||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
| That would reopen the door to wave theories similar to the æther theory of the 1800s. | That would reopen the door to wave theories similar to the æther theory of the 1800s. | ||
| - | The bulk of this site describes | + | The bulk of this website will describe |
| - | The preliminary analysis and conclusions | + | The preliminary analysis and conclusions |
| - | Next, the logic of Falsification is discussed. | + | Next, the relationship |
| - | And finally, the implications of the fall of relativity and, in turn, of statistical particle physics and the return of wave physics | + | And finally, the implications of the required extensions to relativity and to statistical particle physics and the return of deterministic |
| - | ...sz | + | < |
| + | use straight arm length, not size | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| {{tag> | {{tag> | ||